Reading non-fiction
Summarise and analyse unseen non-fiction - identifying ideas, synthesising evidence and examining the writer’s language (Paper 2, Section A).
Learn
Reading non-fiction, explained point by point
Everything the GCSE specification expects you to be able to do, and how to actually do it - the same lesson a signed-in student studies from.
Find and interpret explicit and implicit information in non-fiction texts (AO1)
Non-fiction carries facts on the surface and attitudes underneath. "The hotel was adequate" states a fact and implies a sniff of disappointment. Retrieve accurately for the opening questions, then read between the lines: what does the writer assume, admire, or quietly resent?
Summarise and synthesise information from two texts (AO1)
The synthesis question asks what two texts show about a shared subject - say, the differences between two school days. Pair a point from each text with brief evidence, and add the inference that links them: "Both writers describe strict teachers, but only the Victorian pupil faces physical punishment." Differences and similarities both count; interpretation lifts the mark.
Analyse how writers use language in non-fiction, including older texts (AO2)
The same analytical toolkit as fiction applies: emotive vocabulary, statistics deployed for shock, direct address, irony. A 19th-century text may sound formal, but its techniques are recognisable - a long accumulating list of grievances builds outrage in any century. Quote briefly, name the method, explain the effect on the reader.
Understand how purpose, audience and form shape a non-fiction text (AO2)
A broadsheet article, a memoir and a campaign letter make different moves because they want different things from different readers. Ask who the text is for and what it wants them to do or feel - a travel writer entertaining tourists selects very different details from a charity pleading for donations. Purpose explains almost every choice a writer makes.
Select precise evidence and build inferences the text can support (AO1)
Every claim about a writer's meaning needs words from the text behind it, and the inference must stay within what the evidence shows. "The writer calls the crowd 'a swarm', suggesting she finds them mindless and faintly threatening" is grounded; guessing her whole biography from one word is not. Precise and modest beats sweeping and unsupported.
Practice
Try a Reading non-fiction question
A GCSE-style original task from this topic. Sketch a quick plan of your own before you open what a strong answer covers.
Read the two sources below - both original passages written for practice - and then answer the question that follows. Source A: from a food blog published in 2023, "School dinners: the glow-up nobody expected". My little sister's school canteen would put some restaurants to shame. There's a salad bar (an actual salad bar), a daily veggie option that isn't just "the same thing minus the meat", and a chef - a real one, with opinions about paprika - who tweets the menu every morning. Water fountains everywhere. Fruit by the tills. On Fridays there's a "world food" counter; last week it was Ghanaian jollof, and there was a queue out the door. Portions are generous, and if you're on free school meals, nobody can tell: everyone taps the same card. Source B: from a memoir written in the voice of the 1890s, recalling a village school. Our dinner at the schoolhouse was the same each day, and we were glad of it. Each child brought what the house could spare: a hunk of bread, cold potato, perhaps a twist of dripping in paper. The master's wife kept a great pot upon the stove, and for a farthing a week she would fill your can with broth - thin, grey stuff, but hot, and in January hotness was everything. Some children brought nothing at all and sat apart while the rest of us ate. I remember their watching most of all. There was no water but the pump in the yard, which froze from November. Use details from BOTH sources to answer this question: summarise the differences between the school meals described in Source A and Source B. [8 marks]
Show what a strong answer covers
The marking points an examiner looks for. Not a model answer - a checklist to plan against.
- AO1: identifies clear differences in the food itself - varied, plentiful modern menus (salad bar, world food, generous portions) versus repetitive, scarce fare (bread, cold potato, thin broth)
- AO1: identifies differences in provision and who supplies the food - school-provided meals with a professional chef in Source A versus food brought from home "what the house could spare" in Source B
- AO1: interprets the difference in how poverty is treated - invisible in Source A ("everyone taps the same card") versus painfully visible in Source B (children with nothing who "sat apart")
- AO1: synthesises evidence from both sources with apt, precise quotation or paraphrase, making inferences (e.g. about comfort, choice and dignity) rather than only copying details